I say it every season -- we spend waaaaaaayy too much time worrying about the first round. It is nowhere close to a lock that your first-round selection will perform like a first-round selection. In fact, the data says exactly the opposite. So why, each and every season, do we perseverate on what to do in the first round? Because we think it matters.
We think there must be some advantage to taking Player A over Player B. There has to be a better player to take than the one others believe. We even think it matters as to what pick we have in the first round. How many times have I been asked, “Hey Ray, if given the choice, which pick would you choose in Round 1?” I’m not saying that I don’t prefer certain players. It would be stupid for me to suggest I didn’t have a preference, but I’m not going to feel like my draft is lost if I don’t get the guy I want in the first round, and neither should you. Why? History tells us we stink at predicting who will produce, and that means all the consternation about your first-round selection is giving you ulcers for no reason.
I hope the folks over at Baseball HQ consider me a friend, because the following statement comes from them: According to research, since the 2004 season, the odds of a player with a top-15 ADP producing an actual top-15 season is 35.5-percent. That’s barely one out of three. Let me say that again. You, me, Jim, Jennifer... we all have roughly a 1-in-3 chance of our top-15 pick producing a top-15 season. It’s just a fact. Over more than a decade of data tells us that. So again, I ask you, why do you worry so much about your first-round selection when it’s clear you only have about a 1/3 chance to emerge with first-round production from your first-round selection?
Let’s look back at ADP data from the NFBC from 2016. Here are the top-15 players according to that data:
Players in green were hits as top-15 performers at the conclusion of the 2016 season.
Player | ADP |
1.62 | |
2.32 | |
2.81 | |
3.91 | |
5.78 | |
7.85 | |
8.04 | |
6.84 | |
9.96 | |
10.12 | |
11.72 | |
12.81 | |
13.16 | |
14.18 | |
14.98 |
Last year there were seven hits, or 46.7-percent, in the top-15. Historically speaking, that’s a huge return of success and it was still less than 50 percent. Even last year, when we blew past the historical average, we still “hit” on less than half the players we predicted were worth a first-round selection.
Even if I get the guy I want in the first round, I’m realistic with my understanding of how this thing works, which is, in most instances, it doesn’t. A few data points for you to consider before you pull your remaining hair out, worrying about that first selection on draft day.
1 – You will spend far too much time, thought and consternation trying to decide who to take in the first round.
2 – It really doesn’t matter whether you get Player A or B. At least it doesn’t, historically speaking.
3 – Multiple players taken in the first round will bomb in 2017.
4 – No one knows which first-round players will bomb in 2017.
5 – You will look back at the end of the season and say to yourself, “Why did I take that guy in the first round?”
6 – First-round picks fail every year. Wait, I already wrote that.
7 – Historically speaking, your odds of “hitting” on the first-round selection are about the same as producing a hit would be to the Major League batting average leader.
8 – We stink at predicting who will produce first-round value.
9 – The only thing you really need to make sure you do in the first round is avoid making a mistake. Mistakes would include (A) taking an injury-prone player, (B) taking an unproven player, (C) choosing a pitcher, (D) reaching on a player. There are times and places where A, B, C and D are great moves. That place is not the first round.
I would ask you to pay special attention to point #9. We know that we cannot predict who will be a top-15 player with a high degree of certainty. Again, more than a decade of data tells us that. Therefore, we have to do everything we can to remove the players who are ‘most likely to fail.’ I humbly suggest you read points A-through-D again. Those are four key points you should sear into your noggin to help you avoid the players who would place you at great risk of being one of the two-thirds of folks who will end up being disappointed.
As for the pitcher thing... make sure to read Never Draft A Starting Pitcher Early to see why, even though Kershaw and Scherzer succeeded last year, that the odds of your team benefitting from spending an early selection on pitching is pretty low.
Player News
Daulton Varsho picked up three hits, three RBI and a homer in a win over the Angels on Thursday.
Varsho has only played in seven games this year, but they’ve been seven good ones. He’s homered three times already, and his slugging percentage is a remarkable — and entirely unsustainable — .727 over 22 at-bats. Varsho has been a mediocre offensive player in his two seasons with the Blue Jays, but it’s possible at the age of 28 he’s having a breakout campaign. Far from a guarantee, but possible.
Taylor Ward hit a two-run homer in a loss to the Blue Jays on Thursday.
Ward, 31, gave the Angels a 2-0 lead with a two-run homer off Chris Bassitt in the first inning. He’s now gone deep in two of his last three games, and it ‘improves’ his slash to .181/.224/.391. Ward has been one of the most hot/cold players players in the sport over the last few years, so fantasy managers who can afford to make some roster moves may want to look at Ward while the going is good.
Vladimir Guerrero Jr. picked up three hits and scored twice in an 8-5 win over the Angels on Thursday.
Guerrero also drew a walk. It gives the first baseman multiple hits in back-to-back games, and it’s the third time in May that he’s reached that mark. That’s helped raise his average from .268 to .295, and the only thing fantasy managers can be disappointed with is his .432 slugging percentage. That number should continue to climb as the season unfolds, but Vladdy Jr. has had some inconsistent seasons when it comes to power production.
Chad Green picked up his first save of 2025 with a scoreless ninth against the Angels on Thursday.
Green got the save after Jeff Hoffman worked in back-to-back games — and struggled — in the first two contests against the Angels. He struck out two and looked the part while needing just nine pitches to get through the inning. Hoffman should remain the closer, but Green is on his tail if the struggles were to continue.
Chris Bassitt allowed five runs — four earned — while working six-plus innings against the Angels on Thursday while picking up a win.
Bassitt allowed three runs over the first two innings on a pair of homers, but settled down over his next four frames. He came out to work the seventh, but ended up being charged for two more runs after leaving the contest. The 36-year-old veteran has forged a 3.35 ERA and outstanding 49/8 K/BB ratio over the first quarter of the season, but this wasn’t him at his best. He’ll get the Rays next week if the rotation order stays the same for Toronto.
José Soriano allowed three runs over five innings while not factoring in the decision Thursday against the Blue Jays.
Soriano left with a 4-3 lead, but it was erased quickly after his departure. The 26-year-old was not exactly dominant in his outing with eight hits allowed and four free passes, but he did strike out six to help balance things out a smidgen. Soriano takes an even ERA of 4.00 into a scheduled start against the Padres in San Diego on Tuesday. There should be better options for that one.