Toyota/Save Mart 350 NASCAR DFS Playbook: Kyle Larson, Tyler Reddick Battle In Sonoma

Published: Jun 11, 2023
The Toyota/Save Mart 350. NASCAR’s annual venture into California wine country and Sonoma Raceway. After the excitement the NASCAR entry in the 24 hour of Le Mans generated, it’s time to see how a Cup car handles the elevation and right- and left-turns of Sonoma. How are we playing this slate for DraftKings and FanDuel for NASCAR DFS? Who are the top drivers to play for the Toyota/Save Mart 350? With no stage breaks during the race, how does the strategy change for Sunday? Practice and Qualifying results for Sonoma, what do we make of them? All of this and the best NASCAR drivers to play for the Toyota/Save Mart 350 are in this week’s NASCAR DFS Playbook!
2023 Toyota/Save Mart 350 Track Layout
We’ve typically seen the same, 1.99-mile, 12-turn, layout for the Toyota/Save Mart 350 over the history of the event. They did switch things up a year or two ago to incorporate the Carousel portion of the track. That won’t be the case this year though. For 2023, Sonoma Raceway is going with the standard NASCAR layout that goes with the so-called Short Chute layout between Turn 4 and Turn 7. They feel there’s more chances for passing with that than the Carousel layout does. The other part of the layout that is tricky not only the hairpin Turn 11 but also the elevation change. The 160 feet of change per lap makes overshooting braking zones easier to do than we think.
NASCAR DFS Strategy For Sonoma
When we look below, it seems to be clear as to what a bit of the strategy is: get laps led and some PD. However, it’s going be a bit different this year for nabbing those stats given there’s no stage cautions, like we had at COTA. Earlier in the year we saw that drivers who started toward the front tended to stay there as they didn’t have the weird strategy choices of stages breaks to deal with. Will that be the case again at Sonoma? It’s entirely possible that the cars that are fastest enough to be up front will remain so throughout the race and dictate pit strategy rather than stage cautions doing that. However, there are several cars that messed up qualifying and should be major threats for PD upside.
On that note, if we look at the table below, we can see that moving up here is possible. Not only for six spots but also double-digits. We saw that last year with Austin Cindric, and others, who started outside the top-20 and moved up. Looking at the PTQ table below can also show us who might be in that spot this year. The stats in the table below come from the last five Sonoma races, all of which had stage cautions so take a few of them more cautiously than others. Which ones? Well, it appears, based on COTA, that the cars up front stand a chance to dominate the race in terms of laps led with others getting a handful based on pit cycles.
Race | Race | Race | Race | Race | ||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | AVG | |
Positive Place Differential | 20 | 18 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 20.4 |
Six+ Place Differential Spots | 11 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 10.4 |
Double-Digit Place Differential | 6 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
Double-Digit Fast Laps | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.2 |
20+ Laps Led | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
50+ Laps Led | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.6 |
100+ Laps Led | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lead Lap Finishers | 31 | 33 | 24 | 21 | 23 | 26.4 |
Top-10 Finish % | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 48% |
This year, more so than others, we are likely to see tire fall off play a role in the race and shuffling the order because of the expected long runs in the race and the worn out surface, combined with a change in tire construction from Goodyear. The drivers who can manage tires better will last longer, later. That’s also why we’re looking at Green Flag Speed and Late-Run Speed this week as key indicators from previous road races as to who might be there at the end. I’ll make reference to those stats in the analysis for drivers and they played a role in the projections for this week.
NASCAR Practice and Qualifying Results at Sonoma
The following chart shows where drivers ran in qualifying compared to where they qualified. Keep in mind that the long-run speed at practice isn’t shown over as many laps as a typical oval race given the length of the lap at Sonoma.
Driver | Avg. Prac to Qual | Qual | 1-Lap | 5-Lap |
Denny Hamlin | -11 | 1 | 13 | 11 |
Tyler Reddick | -5 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Michael McDowell | -1 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Christopher Bell | -15 | 4 | 22 | 16 |
AJ Allmendinger | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Ty Gibbs | -3 | 6 | 10 | 7 |
Chris Buescher | -4 | 7 | 14 | 8 |
Martin Truex Jr | 5 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
Daniel Suarez | -11 | 9 | 20 | |
Chase Elliott | 5 | 10 | 7 | 4 |
Austin Dillon | 2 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
Kyle Busch | -5 | 12 | 15 | 18 |
Ricky Stenhouse Jr | -2 | 13 | 9 | 21 |
Alex Bowman | 3 | 14 | 11 | 12 |
Ross Chastain | 6 | 15 | 12 | 6 |
Kyle Larson | 15 | 16 | 1 | 1 |
Joey Logano | 0 | 17 | 21 | 13 |
Bubba Wallace | -2 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
Corey LaJoie | 3 | 19 | 17 | 15 |
Aric Almirola | -10 | 20 | 34 | 25 |
Kevin Harvick | -7 | 21 | 28 | 27 |
Ryan Preece | -6 | 22 | 31 | 24 |
Justin Haley | 17 | 23 | 6 | |
Chase Briscoe | 3 | 24 | 24 | 19 |
Brad Keselowski | 9 | 25 | 18 | 14 |
William Byron | -1 | 26 | 25 | 29 |
Ty Dillon | 3 | 27 | 23 | 26 |
Erik Jones | -1 | 28 | 29 | |
Josh Bilicki | -4 | 29 | 33 | |
Zane Smith | 4 | 30 | 30 | 23 |
Ryan Blaney | 15 | 31 | 16 | 17 |
Todd Gilliland | 8 | 32 | 27 | 22 |
Andy Lally | 1 | 33 | 36 | 28 |
Austin Cindric | 8 | 34 | 26 | |
Grant Enfinger | 3 | 35 | 35 | 30 |
Harrison Burton | 4 | 36 | 32 |
DFS Points By Starting Spot for DraftKings and FanDuel
These charts are made by taking the results of the previous five races at Sonoma and compiling points based strictly on starting spot. They are meant to show more of the strategy for building lineups rather than what specific starting spot we’re looking to play this week.


Start (Click to sort ascending) | Pos (Click to sort ascending) | Player (Click to sort ascending) | DK (Click to sort ascending) | FD (Click to sort ascending) |
---|---|---|---|---|
16 | D | Kyle Larson | 10600 | 13500 |
Do we have to explain this one? He’s won a few times here and has had the fastest car the last three races at Sonoma. He appears to have that again and simply missed a corner in qualifying which has him starting P15. That makes him a threat to win and pack PD punch as well. That’s what we call a seriously popular option in DFS. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
2 | D | Tyler Reddick | 10400 | 13000 |
Same with Reddick, do we have to explain this one? He won at COTA, in dominating fashion, he’s also won three of the last five total road races. He’ll start P2 on Sunday and had one of the fastest cars in lap averages in practice. Reddick has been so quick that Hamlin, his team owner, is using his setup here to try and even the playing field. Expect Reddick to be amongst the most popular plays in both formats and a serious threat to win and dominate. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
10 | D | Chase Elliott | 10300 | 14000 |
Previously we’ve called Elliott the best road racer in the field. That might not be the case anymore. While he’s still a quality road racer, he’s slipped of late to an average finish of P8 in his last nine such races without a win and hasn’t led as many laps. Elliott is now in a win-to-get-in situation for the playoffs given the injury and suspension he’s had. The 9-car will pull off 10th to start and he showed the speed we’re accustomed to from him as well. Get ready for Elliott to be a real threat once more on Sunday. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
12 | D | Kyle Busch | 10100 | 11500 |
Despite all his hemming and hawing at practice about how bad the car was, Busch still managed to qualify it P12 and ran around there in lap averages. So what to make of his issues? Were they genuine or a bit of overselling things given his high standards? I tend to believe it’s the latter rather than the former considering this is the car that Reddick won multiple times in on road courses last year and Busch himself has won thrice in already this year. Busch is always a crafty driver and his crew chief is certainly capable of making adjustments to get him a top-five car. Let’s not forget he’s the winningest crew chief over the last 33 points-paying races in the garage. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
9 | D | Daniel Suárez | 9500 | 11000 |
It was easy to credit his Sonoma win last year as a one-off strong showing where everything went his way. However, that was until COTA this year when he was also strong before the chaos late got the best of him. The car was iffy on the single-lap run in practice but as they went to work on it, it got better as the session continued ultimately landing him at 10th in overall lap average. He likely gets a boost in folks playing him because of the win last year but he’s still a better fit for GPPs given the P9 starting spot and not a ton of easily seeable upside. Game Type: GPP | ||||
5 | D | AJ Allmendinger | 9300 | 10500 |
Allmendinger is an interesting one. Despite having all of the open-wheel and road racing bona fides to his name, it’s been a bit of a struggle for him to run consistently well on these tracks in the Cup series. Sure, he has five top-10s in nine races including a win, but three of the other finishes, including COTA, have been P33 or worse. The car looks great this weekend and he’s getting extra track time in the Xfinity Series event but the fact that he’s starting P5 does cap the upside a bit to about a 42-43 point ceiling. Game Type: GPP | ||||
34 | D | Austin Cindric | 9100 | 9500 |
I do have to say that I liked this play a bit more before he qualified P34. If you watched the Grill vs. Grille video on FA’s YouTube Channel you’d see I took him for a Top-10 Finish prop, again before he qualified where he did. At least there was better speed in practice, somewhat. The setup on the car needs work and he’ll need his fair share of breaks to move up well, but we did see him start P25 last year and finish P5 when everyone else seemingly couldn’t pass. He has far too much experience on road layouts to be overlooked this week in either format, even at this price. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
1 | D | Denny Hamlin | 8900 | 7200 |
Apparently burrowing his driver’s setup, I’m talking about Reddick, helped him out since he out-qualified him with it. Does that P1 starting spot help him dominate the race? That’s tougher to see given the practice speed wasn’t quite as good and the long-run speed hasn’t been great for Hamlin in the last 10 road races either. I can see Hamlin leading the first handful of laps before Reddick finds a way past him. That might cap his upside and really relegates him to GPPs as there’s just not enough upside or consistency here to justify a cash game play for Hamlin. Game Type: GPP | ||||
8 | D | Martin Truex | 8800 | 8200 |
Remember when Truex was a lock-and-load road course play? We’re getting closer to that. While he only had the fifth-best five-lap average in practice, he had the best overall lap average over his nine laps run. Truex also had the second-best single-lap speed behind only Larson, though by about half a second. Starting P8 gives him some PD upside for a top-five finish and gives him a small shot at the win as well. Keep in mind that three of his four road course wins have come at Sonoma and he knows how to save tires for late in the runs. Game Type: CASH | ||||
21 | D | Kevin Harvick | 8100 | 8000 |
Eight top-15s in the last 10 road course races and an average PD of nearly six, shows the consistency we’ve come to expect from Harvick. The practice speeds weren’t great to be honest but the counterpoint to that is in most of his previous road races, neither were his starting spots. He’s only started better than P18 twice in the last 10 races but has finished P14 or better all but twice. Can he match that again this week? I think the answer is yes. Game Type: CASH | ||||
7 | D | Chris Buescher | 7900 | 9000 |
He nabbed a runner-up here a year ago but that’s just the tip of the iceberg for his ability on road courses. If we look at the last 10 road races, Buescher has posted the fourth-best average finish (9.4) and has the second-most top-10s (7) in the field. Impressive right? The Fords which struggle elsewhere, don’t struggle on road courses so we don’t have to downgrade them for aero issues. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
6 | D | Ty Gibbs | 7500 | 6200 |
Some of the luster has fallen off Gibbs over the last few races as he’s spent more time going backward than moving up through a field. However, if we go back prior to that, he had a good run at COTA and had a run of top-10 finishes. In his four road races in the Cup Series, he’s finished top-10 once and top-20 twice in total. He’s also getting more seat time in the Xfinity race on Saturday evening which can only help him for Sunday’s race with the flow of a lap. Gibbs is a GPP play with a shot for a solid top-10 finish. Game Type: GPP | ||||
3 | D | Michael McDowell | 7400 | 7000 |
By now we should know his road racing bona fides. McDowell finished P3 here a year ago and that started a run of four-straight top-10 finishes for him and then he got back in the swing of things with a P12 at COTA. The only downside to McDowell this week, and it’s a big one, is that he’s starting P3. Why is that a downside? That was likely his ceiling for finishing position which means there’s basically no upside to his play except in GPPs if he can hold this spot. Game Type: GPP | ||||
23 | D | Justin Haley | 6700 | 5200 |
Haley showed P6 single-lap practice speeds and the 10th-best overall lap average, though he didn’t run five-consecutive laps in practice. That was before qualifying P23. So can he replicate his practice run? Doubtful. Can he move up from his starting spot? Absolutely. Haley has basically the same setup as Allmendinger and he’s certainly picking up tips and tricks from his teammate too. PD upside is strong here and the price tag is low. Game Type: CASH | ||||
11 | D | Austin Dillon | 6100 | 5800 |
This is simply based on the eye test this weekend. The 3-car looks good on track and stable. He does have six top-20 finishes in the last 10 road races. This one isn’t for the faint of heart though as he’ll undoubtedly make a mistake somewhere that leaves us questioning. However, if he can keep it clean, unlike last week, there could be value here below the mid-tier we’re used to seeing him in. Game Type: GPP | ||||
13 | D | Ricky Stenhouse | 5900 | 4800 |
This is a surprising one to put in a road course playbook but sometimes the odd ones win you money. He showed solid speed at practice and then qualified P13. The last time there was road course race, COTA, he nabbed a top-10 finish, his lone such finish in the last 10 road races. Granted, that was a bit due to attrition, but he still ran a clean race, again odd for Stenhouse. This is a GPP-only, low-ownership option but if he holds his starting spot, he hits value. Game Type: GPP | ||||
30 | D | Zane Smith | 5700 | 3500 |
He’s back. He’s also in the 38-car again this weekend. That’s good as we’ve seen that car not really care who’s driving it as it has speed. Smith ran it well in the 600 and this car nabbed a top-10 at COTA earlier in the year. Smith has been a great road racer in the Truck Series and given the speed in the 38-Front Row car, he should have that ability on display again on Sunday. I even wrote up a +900 Top-10 Finish bet on Smith in my weekly NASCAR betting piece for Pickswise. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
19 | D | Corey LaJoie | 5300 | 4000 |
Back down to where we’ve gotten used to seeing Lajoie in the price range department. His trial in the 9-car didn’t go great last week but now we’re at a road course and he’s been pretty good when right turns are involved. Lajoie has four top-20s in the last 10 road races and the last two are P12 and P11 at COTA this year. There’s a bit of a risk here that the lack of stage breaks keeps him further back but it’s a risk we can take at this price tag and given his P11 at COTA. Game Type: GPP | ||||
29 | D | Josh Bilicki | 4900 | 2000 |
Okay Matt, have you lost your damn mind? I mean really, Bilicki? In a playbook? This isn’t Daytona or ‘Dega you know, right? Yes, but hear me (or read me) out. He’s literally as cheap as it gets on both sites, and for good reason, except on road courses. Pulled out a P26 finish at COTA, which gave him seven spots of PD and he has three top-22 finishes in his last eight road races. Bilicki has averaged six spots of PD in his last eight races as well. He’s really only an option to try and get one more high-priced driver into your lineup and there is a risk that he simply doesn’t do anything in the race. Game Type: CASH & GPP |
16 | D | Kyle Larson, D | 10600 | 13500 |
Do we have to explain this one? He’s won a few times here and has had the fastest car the last three races at Sonoma. He appears to have that again and simply missed a corner in qualifying which has him starting P15. That makes him a threat to win and pack PD punch as well. That’s what we call a seriously popular option in DFS. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
2 | D | 10400 | 13000 | |
Same with Reddick, do we have to explain this one? He won at COTA, in dominating fashion, he’s also won three of the last five total road races. He’ll start P2 on Sunday and had one of the fastest cars in lap averages in practice. Reddick has been so quick that Hamlin, his team owner, is using his setup here to try and even the playing field. Expect Reddick to be amongst the most popular plays in both formats and a serious threat to win and dominate. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
10 | D | 10300 | 14000 | |
Previously we’ve called Elliott the best road racer in the field. That might not be the case anymore. While he’s still a quality road racer, he’s slipped of late to an average finish of P8 in his last nine such races without a win and hasn’t led as many laps. Elliott is now in a win-to-get-in situation for the playoffs given the injury and suspension he’s had. The 9-car will pull off 10th to start and he showed the speed we’re accustomed to from him as well. Get ready for Elliott to be a real threat once more on Sunday. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
12 | D | Kyle Busch, D | 10100 | 11500 |
Despite all his hemming and hawing at practice about how bad the car was, Busch still managed to qualify it P12 and ran around there in lap averages. So what to make of his issues? Were they genuine or a bit of overselling things given his high standards? I tend to believe it’s the latter rather than the former considering this is the car that Reddick won multiple times in on road courses last year and Busch himself has won thrice in already this year. Busch is always a crafty driver and his crew chief is certainly capable of making adjustments to get him a top-five car. Let’s not forget he’s the winningest crew chief over the last 33 points-paying races in the garage. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
9 | D | 9500 | 11000 | |
It was easy to credit his Sonoma win last year as a one-off strong showing where everything went his way. However, that was until COTA this year when he was also strong before the chaos late got the best of him. The car was iffy on the single-lap run in practice but as they went to work on it, it got better as the session continued ultimately landing him at 10th in overall lap average. He likely gets a boost in folks playing him because of the win last year but he’s still a better fit for GPPs given the P9 starting spot and not a ton of easily seeable upside. Game Type: GPP | ||||
5 | D | 9300 | 10500 | |
Allmendinger is an interesting one. Despite having all of the open-wheel and road racing bona fides to his name, it’s been a bit of a struggle for him to run consistently well on these tracks in the Cup series. Sure, he has five top-10s in nine races including a win, but three of the other finishes, including COTA, have been P33 or worse. The car looks great this weekend and he’s getting extra track time in the Xfinity Series event but the fact that he’s starting P5 does cap the upside a bit to about a 42-43 point ceiling. Game Type: GPP | ||||
34 | D | 9100 | 9500 | |
I do have to say that I liked this play a bit more before he qualified P34. If you watched the Grill vs. Grille video on FA’s YouTube Channel you’d see I took him for a Top-10 Finish prop, again before he qualified where he did. At least there was better speed in practice, somewhat. The setup on the car needs work and he’ll need his fair share of breaks to move up well, but we did see him start P25 last year and finish P5 when everyone else seemingly couldn’t pass. He has far too much experience on road layouts to be overlooked this week in either format, even at this price. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
1 | D | Denny Hamlin, D | 8900 | 7200 |
Apparently burrowing his driver’s setup, I’m talking about Reddick, helped him out since he out-qualified him with it. Does that P1 starting spot help him dominate the race? That’s tougher to see given the practice speed wasn’t quite as good and the long-run speed hasn’t been great for Hamlin in the last 10 road races either. I can see Hamlin leading the first handful of laps before Reddick finds a way past him. That might cap his upside and really relegates him to GPPs as there’s just not enough upside or consistency here to justify a cash game play for Hamlin. Game Type: GPP | ||||
8 | D | Martin Truex, D | 8800 | 8200 |
Remember when Truex was a lock-and-load road course play? We’re getting closer to that. While he only had the fifth-best five-lap average in practice, he had the best overall lap average over his nine laps run. Truex also had the second-best single-lap speed behind only Larson, though by about half a second. Starting P8 gives him some PD upside for a top-five finish and gives him a small shot at the win as well. Keep in mind that three of his four road course wins have come at Sonoma and he knows how to save tires for late in the runs. Game Type: CASH | ||||
21 | D | 8100 | 8000 | |
Eight top-15s in the last 10 road course races and an average PD of nearly six, shows the consistency we’ve come to expect from Harvick. The practice speeds weren’t great to be honest but the counterpoint to that is in most of his previous road races, neither were his starting spots. He’s only started better than P18 twice in the last 10 races but has finished P14 or better all but twice. Can he match that again this week? I think the answer is yes. Game Type: CASH | ||||
7 | D | 7900 | 9000 | |
He nabbed a runner-up here a year ago but that’s just the tip of the iceberg for his ability on road courses. If we look at the last 10 road races, Buescher has posted the fourth-best average finish (9.4) and has the second-most top-10s (7) in the field. Impressive right? The Fords which struggle elsewhere, don’t struggle on road courses so we don’t have to downgrade them for aero issues. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
6 | D | Ty Gibbs, D | 7500 | 6200 |
Some of the luster has fallen off Gibbs over the last few races as he’s spent more time going backward than moving up through a field. However, if we go back prior to that, he had a good run at COTA and had a run of top-10 finishes. In his four road races in the Cup Series, he’s finished top-10 once and top-20 twice in total. He’s also getting more seat time in the Xfinity race on Saturday evening which can only help him for Sunday’s race with the flow of a lap. Gibbs is a GPP play with a shot for a solid top-10 finish. Game Type: GPP | ||||
3 | D | 7400 | 7000 | |
By now we should know his road racing bona fides. McDowell finished P3 here a year ago and that started a run of four-straight top-10 finishes for him and then he got back in the swing of things with a P12 at COTA. The only downside to McDowell this week, and it’s a big one, is that he’s starting P3. Why is that a downside? That was likely his ceiling for finishing position which means there’s basically no upside to his play except in GPPs if he can hold this spot. Game Type: GPP | ||||
23 | D | Justin Haley, D | 6700 | 5200 |
Haley showed P6 single-lap practice speeds and the 10th-best overall lap average, though he didn’t run five-consecutive laps in practice. That was before qualifying P23. So can he replicate his practice run? Doubtful. Can he move up from his starting spot? Absolutely. Haley has basically the same setup as Allmendinger and he’s certainly picking up tips and tricks from his teammate too. PD upside is strong here and the price tag is low. Game Type: CASH | ||||
11 | D | 6100 | 5800 | |
This is simply based on the eye test this weekend. The 3-car looks good on track and stable. He does have six top-20 finishes in the last 10 road races. This one isn’t for the faint of heart though as he’ll undoubtedly make a mistake somewhere that leaves us questioning. However, if he can keep it clean, unlike last week, there could be value here below the mid-tier we’re used to seeing him in. Game Type: GPP | ||||
13 | D | 5900 | 4800 | |
This is a surprising one to put in a road course playbook but sometimes the odd ones win you money. He showed solid speed at practice and then qualified P13. The last time there was road course race, COTA, he nabbed a top-10 finish, his lone such finish in the last 10 road races. Granted, that was a bit due to attrition, but he still ran a clean race, again odd for Stenhouse. This is a GPP-only, low-ownership option but if he holds his starting spot, he hits value. Game Type: GPP | ||||
30 | D | Zane Smith, D | 5700 | 3500 |
He’s back. He’s also in the 38-car again this weekend. That’s good as we’ve seen that car not really care who’s driving it as it has speed. Smith ran it well in the 600 and this car nabbed a top-10 at COTA earlier in the year. Smith has been a great road racer in the Truck Series and given the speed in the 38-Front Row car, he should have that ability on display again on Sunday. I even wrote up a +900 Top-10 Finish bet on Smith in my weekly NASCAR betting piece for Pickswise. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
19 | D | Corey LaJoie, D | 5300 | 4000 |
Back down to where we’ve gotten used to seeing Lajoie in the price range department. His trial in the 9-car didn’t go great last week but now we’re at a road course and he’s been pretty good when right turns are involved. Lajoie has four top-20s in the last 10 road races and the last two are P12 and P11 at COTA this year. There’s a bit of a risk here that the lack of stage breaks keeps him further back but it’s a risk we can take at this price tag and given his P11 at COTA. Game Type: GPP | ||||
29 | D | Josh Bilicki, D | 4900 | 2000 |
Okay Matt, have you lost your damn mind? I mean really, Bilicki? In a playbook? This isn’t Daytona or ‘Dega you know, right? Yes, but hear me (or read me) out. He’s literally as cheap as it gets on both sites, and for good reason, except on road courses. Pulled out a P26 finish at COTA, which gave him seven spots of PD and he has three top-22 finishes in his last eight road races. Bilicki has averaged six spots of PD in his last eight races as well. He’s really only an option to try and get one more high-priced driver into your lineup and there is a risk that he simply doesn’t do anything in the race. Game Type: CASH & GPP |