NASCAR DFS HighPoint 400 Playbook: Top DraftKings and FanDuel Plays

Published: Jul 23, 2023
Pocono Raceway. The Tricky Triangle. It’s here this weekend. The only Cup race for the legendary Pennsylvania track but that doesn’t make it any tougher or trickier of a track to master. It’s not only unique in layout but also in comparable tracks for NASCAR DFS. This week for the HighPoint.com 400 NASCAR DFS Playbook we’ll break down the strategies for the race, the comparable tracks for Pocono Raceway, and what the practice results and qualifying results say about Sunday’s race. So let’s dive into the DFS podcast and the strategy for DraftKings and FanDuel.
What Makes Pocono Raceway Unique?
Well, the shape for one — a triangle. There are no other triangular-shaped tracks on any other racing schedule in the world. So right off the bat that’s a tough comp, but then there’s the distance of 2.5 miles per lap. The only other ones of that distance are road courses or Daytona and Talladega. The third issue? It’s pretty flat. The steepest corner is Turn 1 at 14 degrees with the others being progressively shallowed at eight and six degrees respectively. If Pocono is sounding hard to comp, it is. But there are tracks we can look at for comparable data. If we look at tracks where they are on the throttle a lot throughout a lap, ones where track position is key and flatter tracks, we can find a good subset of data.
What Tracks Compare To Pocono for NASCAR DFS?
Given the needs for the comparable tracks we listed above, what tracks are we looking to take our data from? Firstly, they have to be only 2022-2023 races since those are the ones using the Gen 7 cars. Secondly, we’re looking at Auto Club, Las Vegas, Kansas, Charlotte, Nashville, Michigan, and of course Pocono. That might sound like an interesting grouping but most of those are on-throttle layouts with tough passing conditions and a few are shallower than you’d expect like Michigan, Kansas, and Nashville. Those 12 races make up the data referenced in the playbook.
DraftKings NASCAR DFS Strategy for HighPoint 400
If we take a look at the chart below, we’ll see the scoring by starting spot over the last five Pocono races, excluding the second of the back-to-back races in 2020 and 2021. This should give us a good idea of what we’re looking at for strategy for DraftKings scoring.

As we can see, laps-led targets are key as is position differential. While we’d suspect that passing is tough and starting up front is a guarantee to win and lead laps, it’s not always. There are late-race strategies that can shift a lot of drivers around, especially in fuel mileage races. Aside from last year when Hamlin won but was DQ’d, the last pole-sitter to win was back in 2017. Over the last five races here, we’ve seen an average of one driver a race leading 50 or more laps a race and two drivers to top 20 laps led. The fastest laps are fairly spread out with an average of four drivers a race reaching double-digit tallies.
FanDuel NASCAR DFS Strategy for HighPoint 400
If we take a look at the chart below, we’ll see the scoring by starting spot over the last five Pocono races, excluding the second of the back-to-back races in 2020 and 2021. This should give us a good idea of what we’re looking at for strategy for FanDuel scoring.

In general here, we’re shooting for drivers who are going to finish inside the top-10 and complete as many laps as possible while also moving up. So while the laps-led stats don’t matter as much here for FanDuel, though they’re a good differentiator, the more important ones are passing and finishing. Pocono has one of the lowest top-10 finish% of any track on the schedule. What does that mean? Well, over the last five races here, on average, 30-percent of the drivers who start outside the top-12 finish inside the top-10. That means that 7-in-10 spots in the final top-10 are drivers who started there. So if we’re targeting finishing position points, we need to look mainly for drivers starting in the top-10 while sprinkling in some starting further back. There’s also been an average of 5.4 drivers a race moving up at least 10 spots. If we combine top-10 starters with a few guys we expect to move up, that’s the winning strategy for FanDuel and laps led are simply gravy at that point.
NASCAR Pocono Practice and Qualifying Results
This table should give you an idea of who might move up and who may fall back from their starting spots. It shows single-lap, 5-lap, 10-lap, and overall lap averages from practice and how the qualifying results compare with the average of those.
Driver | Avg. Prac to Qual | Qual | 1-Lap | 5-Lap | 10-lap | Overall |
William Byron | -1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Martin Truex Jr | -1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
Kyle Larson | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | ||
Kevin Harvick | -8 | 4 | 13 | 12 | 8 | 14 |
Christopher Bell | -20 | 5 | 24 | 28 | 24 | |
Joey Logano | -12 | 6 | 23 | 15 | 17 | |
Tyler Reddick | 4 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Denny Hamlin | 0 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
Austin Cindric | -11 | 9 | 20 | 21 | 20 | |
Bubba Wallace | -4 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 15 | |
Ty Gibbs | 5 | 11 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
Corey Lajoie | -5 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 19 | |
Brad Keselowski | -12 | 13 | 17 | 29 | 29 | |
Ryan Blaney | 0 | 14 | 11 | 8 | 22 | |
Michael McDowell | -8 | 15 | 27 | 19 | 23 | |
AJ Allmendinger | 0 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 21 | |
Daniel Suarez | 4 | 17 | 18 | 11 | 11 | |
Chris Buescher | 13 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
Justin Haley | 2 | 19 | 22 | 13 | ||
Alex Bowman | 11 | 20 | 10 | 7 | 9 | |
Ross Chastain | -6 | 21 | 26 | 23 | 31 | |
Ricky Stenhouse Jr | 2 | 22 | 28 | 18 | 9 | 25 |
Austin Dillon | 9 | 23 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 16 |
Erik Jones | -3 | 24 | 30 | 24 | 27 | |
Kyle Busch | 24 | 25 | 2 | 1 | ||
Harrison Burton | -2 | 26 | 25 | 26 | 33 | |
Aric Almirola | -5 | 27 | 33 | 31 | 32 | |
JJ Yeley | -3 | 28 | 31 | 30 | ||
Chase Briscoe | 3 | 29 | 29 | 22 | 26 | |
BJ McLeod | 12 | 30 | 16 | 20 | 18 | |
Cole Custer | 3 | 31 | 32 | 25 | 28 | |
Noah Gragson | -1 | 32 | 34 | 30 | 35 | |
Ty Dillon | -3 | 33 | 36 | 36 | ||
Ryan Preece | 23 | 34 | 19 | 9 | 6 | 12 |
Chase Elliott | 28 | 35 | 8 | 6 | 7 | |
Todd Gilliland | 4 | 36 | 35 | 27 | 34 |
Start (Click to sort ascending) | Pos (Click to sort ascending) | Player (Click to sort ascending) | DK (Click to sort ascending) | FD (Click to sort ascending) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | D | Martin Truex | 10700 | 14000 |
Tell if you’ve heard this before: It’s a home track for Truex. Aren’t all of them? No seriously though, he grew up in southern Jersey so this and Dover are the two closest. Truex is coming off of a dominating performance last week at New Hampshire and backed it up with top-five speed at practice and qualifying. He’s posted an average finish of 8.9 over the last two years at similar tracks and 9.5 at Pocono over the last six. So basically we’re saying he’s another threat this week with a car to back him up. Expect laps led and a shot at the win from MTJ. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
8 | D | Denny Hamlin | 10600 | 13500 |
Is there anything else we need say aside from the fact that Hamlin has won here seven times (though only six count)? It’s pretty self-explanatory. However, add to that top-10 speed, a P8 starting spot, and a Crew Chief adept at giving him a better car the longer the race goes and the reasons he’s in the playbook is easy to see. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
25 | D | Kyle Busch | 10500 | 12000 |
What’s real with Busch this week? The P25 qualifying spot or the P2 single-lap speed and P1 overall lap average at practice? I’m prone to believe the practice speed is closer to real. Busch has been great at tracks that Reddick was great at last year and this should be another week where that’s true. Busch has a heck of a history at Pocono and similar races recently. That combined with the PD upside, and his win on Saturday in the Truck race, will make him a very popular play in both formats. Game Type: CASH | ||||
3 | D | Kyle Larson | 10300 | 13000 |
Whether or not we trust his P3 starting spot because of the cloud cover he had a qualifying or not, he’s still fast. The car was fast at practice and has been fast much of the year. In fact, if we give him credit for winning the first race in 2021 when his tire blew on the final corner, his average finish at Pocono while piloting the 5-car is 2.6. That’s going to make him a threat to win every time he steps foot on the property. The only question this year has been can he keep the car clean and here I think that answer is yes. Game Type: GPP | ||||
1 | D | William Byron | 10200 | 12500 |
Where hasn’t Byron been fast this year? It’s been hard to find a place and now he’s fast again this weekend. Byron is on the pole and ran some of the fastest laps in practice prior to that. Him being the pole-sitter is bound to make him a popular pick in GPPs for those that want a bona fide laps-led dominator option. For cash, there’s still a risk that he drops back and costs you more than he helps so be cautious of that. Game Type: GPP | ||||
14 | D | Ryan Blaney | 9800 | 11500 |
The P14 starting spot is probably the best thing for him and us this week. There are plenty of people that will look past him for better PD upside plays and sandwich him for laps-led plays. Don’t get me wrong though, Blaney has some solid value here too. If he finishes P6 and nabs a handful of laps led and/or fastest laps he’ll hit 5x on Sunday. That’s definitely in his wheelhouse, especially at a track he’s won at before. Game Type: GPP | ||||
35 | D | Chase Elliott | 9600 | 10500 |
Had he not spun out of qualifying would he be in the playbook? Well, he ran top-10 in practice and finished P3 (with a technical win) here last year. So yeah, he’d probably be in it, especially at these prices. It doesn’t hurt though that there’s now tons of PD upside from him, aside from making him the easiest play on the board for both formats this week. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
7 | D | Tyler Reddick | 9200 | 9500 |
Is this the week we finally see the Red Dog show up the way he’s capable? He’ll be starting P7 and should have one of the fastest cars on the track given practice. That’s enough to make him a threat but so is his P4 finish here a year ago. Reddick started to right the ship last week with a P6 finish at New Hampshire and has run well at similar tracks this year. He could easily finish top-five with some laps led. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
4 | D | Kevin Harvick | 9000 | 9000 |
The argument here is simple. He’s been the most consistent Ford week-in-and-week-out and he’s been mightily good at Pocono. Harvick has nabbed 11 top-10s in the last 13 trips to the Tricky Triangle and there’s no reason to doubt he won’t hang around there all day. Heck, starting P4 he should have a shot to lead laps. Game Type: CASH | ||||
10 | D | Bubba Wallace | 8500 | 7500 |
It’s perhaps more tempting to roll with Ty Gibbs who’s starting right next to Wallace in the grid, is cheaper, and showed slightly better speed at practice, However, on the whole, Wallace has been better at similar races this year with more than half his laps inside the top-10 and more than 16-percent of his laps inside the top-five. Had he not hit the wall in round two there’s an argument to be made that he’d be on pole. Top-10 starting spots are pretty helpful at Pocono and he’s got the car and Toyota teammates to hold on to it. Game Type: GPP | ||||
20 | D | Alex Bowman | 7900 | 8200 |
It’s been a rough patch for Bowman lately since returning from injury, but that should change this week. The car has speed, running inside the top-10 much of practice, and his teammates have the proper setup too which shows it wasn’t a fluke. The history at this track and similar tracks is also strong with an average finish of 12.8 in the last six Pocono races and 13.0 in the similar races over the last two years. It was another disappointing weekend at New Hampshire but NASCAR is a week-to-week sport and he’s got the equipment and history to nab a top-10 this week. Game Type: CASH | ||||
17 | D | Daniel Suárez | 7700 | 8000 |
While his teammate didn’t bring the speed this week, Suarez certainly did. He ran top-15 in much of practice before qualifying P17. Over the last 12 similar races to Pocono, Suarez has seven top-15s including four top-10s. That also by the way includes a P5 here last year when starting P9. There are a few other drivers around Suarez in the mid-tier of salaries that we might get lower draft percentage than we should which would also be a benefit. Game Type: GPP | ||||
18 | D | Chris Buescher | 7500 | 6800 |
The RFK duo could be interchangeable this weekend but I’ll give credit to Buescher for having better practice times and a slightly worse starting spot while also having run consistently at similar tracks this year. I know that Keselowski has a very strong history here, but this week we’ll take the savings and speed with Buescher. Let’s not forget that Buescher has four top-20s in the last six Pocono races not including him starting P5 last year. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
23 | D | Austin Dillon | 7200 | 7000 |
One of my favorite bets of the week that I made was Austin Dillon with a top-10 finish. That was before practice and qualifying but I’m still standing behind it. He ran in the top-15 for much of practice before qualifying P23 but it’s not just that. He’s finished in the top-10 at four similar tracks this year and has six top-12 finishes at similar tracks the last two years. That’s more than enough to like him but there’s also that he’s 3-5K or so less than his teammate who’s starting right behind him in the grid so we get cost savings too. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
34 | D | Ryan Preece | 6600 | 5000 |
I know the rest of SHR aside from Kevin Harvick hasn’t been great this year, but this week that might change. Preece had too good of a practice run in single-lap, five-lap, and overall-lap averages to be starting P34. The immediate PD upside here will certainly make him likely the most popular driver in this price range on both sites. If you want a GPP pivot, Erik Jones works as a guy in this range with a strong history here but a bad year and so-so weekend to his credit. Game Type: CASH | ||||
19 | D | Justin Haley | 6400 | 4800 |
The big news of the week was Haley moving teams in 2024 to Rick Ware Racing. That kind of news can really boost a driver’s mojo. Haley has run well at the comparable tracks to Pocono this year between Auto Club, Vegas, Kansas, Nashville, and Charlotte. Add to that his P13 overall lap average at practice prior to qualifying P22 and we’ve got some upside for Haley. Game Type: GPP | ||||
22 | D | Ricky Stenhouse | 6200 | 5500 |
Stenhouse was on my list prior to practice and qualifying simply on the strength of how he’s run this year. He’s nabbed four top-10s in the last 12 similar races with top-12s at Charlotte and Kansas. He was also running well at Gateway before caught up in something that wasn’t his making. The mid-20s starting position gives some PD upside and he has a shot at a top-15 finish. That’s more than enough to give us value from Stenhouse. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
12 | D | Corey LaJoie | 5600 | 4200 |
Lajoie is in the midst of a career year right now and he’s the only driver in the field who’s yet to have a DNF on the season. That’s impressive in and of itself, however, he’s still got more for selling points. He qualified P12 and was very close to making the top-10 with his lap before cloud cover gave an advantage to two other drivers. The runs at similar races this year have been all top-20 for the most part. While top-20 isn’t great when starting P12. He has the speed to hold a similar finishing spot compared to his starting spot and that’s enough for value here. There’s also a shot that people don’t play him because of the starting spot. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
36 | D | Todd Gilliland | 5400 | 3000 |
I was waffling on a decision between Gilliland and Harrison Burton in this spot to be perfectly honest. I still think there is upside to Burton and some leverage, but the clearer play is Gilliland. He’s starting P36, aka dead last, and ran basically the same practice speeds as Burton. So he has the PD advantage but will also be popular. If we look at recent similar tracks there’s a case to be made for Burton for GPPs but overall for both GPPs and Cash, Gilliland is the safer, stronger play. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
30 | D | BJ McLeod | 4700 | 2000 |
I know it’s not a plate race but there is something to like about the PD upside we have here. There are plenty of reasons not to play McLeod, his car, his eh performances previously, but there are a couple of reasons to play him as well. He’s bare-bones cheap on both sites which saves money for another top-priced driver. McLeod has also posted some PD upside in previous similar races and at Pocono. That’s good enough for me. Game Type: GPP |
2 | D | Martin Truex, D | 10700 | 14000 |
Tell if you’ve heard this before: It’s a home track for Truex. Aren’t all of them? No seriously though, he grew up in southern Jersey so this and Dover are the two closest. Truex is coming off of a dominating performance last week at New Hampshire and backed it up with top-five speed at practice and qualifying. He’s posted an average finish of 8.9 over the last two years at similar tracks and 9.5 at Pocono over the last six. So basically we’re saying he’s another threat this week with a car to back him up. Expect laps led and a shot at the win from MTJ. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
8 | D | Denny Hamlin, D | 10600 | 13500 |
Is there anything else we need say aside from the fact that Hamlin has won here seven times (though only six count)? It’s pretty self-explanatory. However, add to that top-10 speed, a P8 starting spot, and a Crew Chief adept at giving him a better car the longer the race goes and the reasons he’s in the playbook is easy to see. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
25 | D | Kyle Busch, D | 10500 | 12000 |
What’s real with Busch this week? The P25 qualifying spot or the P2 single-lap speed and P1 overall lap average at practice? I’m prone to believe the practice speed is closer to real. Busch has been great at tracks that Reddick was great at last year and this should be another week where that’s true. Busch has a heck of a history at Pocono and similar races recently. That combined with the PD upside, and his win on Saturday in the Truck race, will make him a very popular play in both formats. Game Type: CASH | ||||
3 | D | Kyle Larson, D | 10300 | 13000 |
Whether or not we trust his P3 starting spot because of the cloud cover he had a qualifying or not, he’s still fast. The car was fast at practice and has been fast much of the year. In fact, if we give him credit for winning the first race in 2021 when his tire blew on the final corner, his average finish at Pocono while piloting the 5-car is 2.6. That’s going to make him a threat to win every time he steps foot on the property. The only question this year has been can he keep the car clean and here I think that answer is yes. Game Type: GPP | ||||
1 | D | 10200 | 12500 | |
Where hasn’t Byron been fast this year? It’s been hard to find a place and now he’s fast again this weekend. Byron is on the pole and ran some of the fastest laps in practice prior to that. Him being the pole-sitter is bound to make him a popular pick in GPPs for those that want a bona fide laps-led dominator option. For cash, there’s still a risk that he drops back and costs you more than he helps so be cautious of that. Game Type: GPP | ||||
14 | D | Ryan Blaney, D | 9800 | 11500 |
The P14 starting spot is probably the best thing for him and us this week. There are plenty of people that will look past him for better PD upside plays and sandwich him for laps-led plays. Don’t get me wrong though, Blaney has some solid value here too. If he finishes P6 and nabs a handful of laps led and/or fastest laps he’ll hit 5x on Sunday. That’s definitely in his wheelhouse, especially at a track he’s won at before. Game Type: GPP | ||||
35 | D | 9600 | 10500 | |
Had he not spun out of qualifying would he be in the playbook? Well, he ran top-10 in practice and finished P3 (with a technical win) here last year. So yeah, he’d probably be in it, especially at these prices. It doesn’t hurt though that there’s now tons of PD upside from him, aside from making him the easiest play on the board for both formats this week. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
7 | D | 9200 | 9500 | |
Is this the week we finally see the Red Dog show up the way he’s capable? He’ll be starting P7 and should have one of the fastest cars on the track given practice. That’s enough to make him a threat but so is his P4 finish here a year ago. Reddick started to right the ship last week with a P6 finish at New Hampshire and has run well at similar tracks this year. He could easily finish top-five with some laps led. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
4 | D | 9000 | 9000 | |
The argument here is simple. He’s been the most consistent Ford week-in-and-week-out and he’s been mightily good at Pocono. Harvick has nabbed 11 top-10s in the last 13 trips to the Tricky Triangle and there’s no reason to doubt he won’t hang around there all day. Heck, starting P4 he should have a shot to lead laps. Game Type: CASH | ||||
10 | D | 8500 | 7500 | |
It’s perhaps more tempting to roll with Ty Gibbs who’s starting right next to Wallace in the grid, is cheaper, and showed slightly better speed at practice, However, on the whole, Wallace has been better at similar races this year with more than half his laps inside the top-10 and more than 16-percent of his laps inside the top-five. Had he not hit the wall in round two there’s an argument to be made that he’d be on pole. Top-10 starting spots are pretty helpful at Pocono and he’s got the car and Toyota teammates to hold on to it. Game Type: GPP | ||||
20 | D | Alex Bowman, D | 7900 | 8200 |
It’s been a rough patch for Bowman lately since returning from injury, but that should change this week. The car has speed, running inside the top-10 much of practice, and his teammates have the proper setup too which shows it wasn’t a fluke. The history at this track and similar tracks is also strong with an average finish of 12.8 in the last six Pocono races and 13.0 in the similar races over the last two years. It was another disappointing weekend at New Hampshire but NASCAR is a week-to-week sport and he’s got the equipment and history to nab a top-10 this week. Game Type: CASH | ||||
17 | D | 7700 | 8000 | |
While his teammate didn’t bring the speed this week, Suarez certainly did. He ran top-15 in much of practice before qualifying P17. Over the last 12 similar races to Pocono, Suarez has seven top-15s including four top-10s. That also by the way includes a P5 here last year when starting P9. There are a few other drivers around Suarez in the mid-tier of salaries that we might get lower draft percentage than we should which would also be a benefit. Game Type: GPP | ||||
18 | D | 7500 | 6800 | |
The RFK duo could be interchangeable this weekend but I’ll give credit to Buescher for having better practice times and a slightly worse starting spot while also having run consistently at similar tracks this year. I know that Keselowski has a very strong history here, but this week we’ll take the savings and speed with Buescher. Let’s not forget that Buescher has four top-20s in the last six Pocono races not including him starting P5 last year. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
23 | D | 7200 | 7000 | |
One of my favorite bets of the week that I made was Austin Dillon with a top-10 finish. That was before practice and qualifying but I’m still standing behind it. He ran in the top-15 for much of practice before qualifying P23 but it’s not just that. He’s finished in the top-10 at four similar tracks this year and has six top-12 finishes at similar tracks the last two years. That’s more than enough to like him but there’s also that he’s 3-5K or so less than his teammate who’s starting right behind him in the grid so we get cost savings too. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
34 | D | Ryan Preece, D | 6600 | 5000 |
I know the rest of SHR aside from Kevin Harvick hasn’t been great this year, but this week that might change. Preece had too good of a practice run in single-lap, five-lap, and overall-lap averages to be starting P34. The immediate PD upside here will certainly make him likely the most popular driver in this price range on both sites. If you want a GPP pivot, Erik Jones works as a guy in this range with a strong history here but a bad year and so-so weekend to his credit. Game Type: CASH | ||||
19 | D | Justin Haley, D | 6400 | 4800 |
The big news of the week was Haley moving teams in 2024 to Rick Ware Racing. That kind of news can really boost a driver’s mojo. Haley has run well at the comparable tracks to Pocono this year between Auto Club, Vegas, Kansas, Nashville, and Charlotte. Add to that his P13 overall lap average at practice prior to qualifying P22 and we’ve got some upside for Haley. Game Type: GPP | ||||
22 | D | 6200 | 5500 | |
Stenhouse was on my list prior to practice and qualifying simply on the strength of how he’s run this year. He’s nabbed four top-10s in the last 12 similar races with top-12s at Charlotte and Kansas. He was also running well at Gateway before caught up in something that wasn’t his making. The mid-20s starting position gives some PD upside and he has a shot at a top-15 finish. That’s more than enough to give us value from Stenhouse. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
12 | D | Corey LaJoie, D | 5600 | 4200 |
Lajoie is in the midst of a career year right now and he’s the only driver in the field who’s yet to have a DNF on the season. That’s impressive in and of itself, however, he’s still got more for selling points. He qualified P12 and was very close to making the top-10 with his lap before cloud cover gave an advantage to two other drivers. The runs at similar races this year have been all top-20 for the most part. While top-20 isn’t great when starting P12. He has the speed to hold a similar finishing spot compared to his starting spot and that’s enough for value here. There’s also a shot that people don’t play him because of the starting spot. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
36 | D | 5400 | 3000 | |
I was waffling on a decision between Gilliland and Harrison Burton in this spot to be perfectly honest. I still think there is upside to Burton and some leverage, but the clearer play is Gilliland. He’s starting P36, aka dead last, and ran basically the same practice speeds as Burton. So he has the PD advantage but will also be popular. If we look at recent similar tracks there’s a case to be made for Burton for GPPs but overall for both GPPs and Cash, Gilliland is the safer, stronger play. Game Type: CASH & GPP | ||||
30 | D | BJ McLeod, D | 4700 | 2000 |
I know it’s not a plate race but there is something to like about the PD upside we have here. There are plenty of reasons not to play McLeod, his car, his eh performances previously, but there are a couple of reasons to play him as well. He’s bare-bones cheap on both sites which saves money for another top-priced driver. McLeod has also posted some PD upside in previous similar races and at Pocono. That’s good enough for me. Game Type: GPP |